Że "coś", w rozumieniu jakiejś pierdoly, się znajdzie jest oczywiste. Ze "to" jest pierdoła, może lepiej niech Boeing udowodni .
https://www.flightglobal.com/airfram...135225.article
The FAA’s Transport Airplane Directorate in 2014 sent a memo to the FAA’s Aircraft Certification Service saying the Max’s rudder cable had inadequate protection and noting Boeing had agreed to comply with 1997 guidance issued by the FAA in response to the deadly 1989 crash of a United Airlines aircraft near Sioux City, Iowa.
But, Boeing “objected to making changes to the design of the 737 Max rudder cable, arguing that changes would be impractical and noting the company’s concern about the potential impact on resources and programme schedules”, the House letter says.
The FAA in 2016 offered Boeing the ability to comply with regulations without design changes, though six FAA “specialists” refused to support that decision, the letter says.
Zakładki